FREE PDF QUIZ CSP-ASSESSOR - SWIFT CUSTOMER SECURITY PROGRAMME ASSESSOR CERTIFICATION PASS-SURE FREE PRACTICE EXAMS

Free PDF Quiz CSP-Assessor - Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification Pass-Sure Free Practice Exams

Free PDF Quiz CSP-Assessor - Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification Pass-Sure Free Practice Exams

Blog Article

Tags: CSP-Assessor Free Practice Exams, Valid CSP-Assessor Braindumps, CSP-Assessor Exam Pass4sure, CSP-Assessor Certification Exam Dumps, CSP-Assessor Download Fee

The system of our CSP-Assessor study materials is great. It is developed and maintained by our company’s professional personnel and is dedicated to provide the first-tier service to the clients. Our system updates the CSP-Assessor study materials periodically and frequently to provide more learning resources and responds to the clients’ concerns promptly. Our system will supplement New CSP-Assessor Study Materials and functions according to the clients’ requirements and surveys the clients’ satisfaction degrees about our CSP-Assessor study materials.

We have put substantial amount of money and effort into upgrading the quality of our CSP-Assessor preparation materials, into our own CSP-Assessor sales force and into our after sale services. This is built on our in-depth knowledge of our customers, what they want and what they need. It is based on our brand, if you read the website carefully, you will get a strong impression of our brand and what we stand for. There are so many advantages of our CSP-Assessor Actual Exam, and you are welcome to have a try!

>> CSP-Assessor Free Practice Exams <<

Valid CSP-Assessor Braindumps | CSP-Assessor Exam Pass4sure

Our products are the accumulation of professional knowledge worthy practicing and remembering. There are so many specialists who join together and contribute to the success of our CSP-Assessor guide quiz just for your needs. Our responsible and patient staff who has being trained strictly before get down to business and interact with customers. Once you have practiced and experienced the quality of our CSP-Assessor Exam Preparation, you will remember the serviceability and usefulness of them. It explains why our CSP-Assessor practice materials helped over 98 percent of exam candidates get the certificate you dream of successfully. Believe me you can get it too.

Swift CSP-Assessor Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Understanding the methodology and assessment deliverables: This section is designed for independent auditors working with Swift systems. It tests the candidate's grasp of the Assessor's role and obligations when conducting a CSP assessment. The section evaluates knowledge of key elements to consider during the assessment process.
Topic 2
  • Understanding the Swift Customer Security Programme: This domain is targeted at compliance officers, and risk managers involved in Swift operations. It evaluates the candidate's comprehension of the CSP controls framework and their ability to determine the appropriate architecture type and related scope as outlined in the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF).
Topic 3
  • Understanding Swift: This section of the exam measures the skills of Swift network administrators and covers Swift's crucial role in the international financial community, including the structure and operations of the Swift network and its infrastructure.

Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification Sample Questions (Q104-Q109):

NEW QUESTION # 104
The Swift user would like to perform their CSP assessment in May for the CSCF version that will only be active as from July the same year. Is it allowed?

  • A. No, an assessment can only be done on the active version of the CSCF
  • B. Yes, the assessment on a particular version can start before the actual activation date

Answer: B

Explanation:
This question examines the timing of a CSP assessment relative to the activation of a new CSCF version, a key aspect of compliance under the Swift Customer Security Programme.
Step 1: Understand CSP Assessment Timing
TheSwift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF)requires users to perform an independent assessment annually or as mandated, based on the active version of the CSCF at the time of attestation. The Independent Assessment FrameworkandSwift CSP Compliance Guidelinesprovide rules on version applicability and assessment scheduling.
Step 2: Analyze the Scenario
The scenario states that the Swift user wants to perform their CSP assessment in May for a CSCF version that will become active in July of the same year. We need to determine if this is permissible.
Step 3: Evaluate Against Swift CSP Guidelines
* TheCSCF v2024andSwift CSP FAQallow users to prepare for upcoming CSCF versions before their activation date. Swift releases new versions with advance notice (typically 6-12 months), and users are encouraged to align their compliance efforts with the upcoming version to ensure readiness.
* TheIndependent Assessment Frameworkspecifies that assessments must be based on the CSCF version in effect at the time of attestation (e.g., submission to Swift). However, users can conduct preparatory assessments or self-assessments on a future version before its activation date to plan and implement necessary changes. The official attestation must still align with the active version, but early assessment is not prohibited.
* For example, if the assessment in May is a preparatory exercise (e.g., a pre-assessment or gap analysis) for the July version, it is allowed. The final attestation would then be submitted once the version is active (e.g., in July or later), ensuring compliance with the active framework.
Step 4: Conclusion and Verification
The answer isB, as theCSCF v2024andIndependent Assessment Frameworkpermit users to start assessments on a particular version before its activation date for planning purposes, provided the official attestation aligns with the active version at the time of submission.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Section: Assessment Timing.
* Swift Independent Assessment Framework, Section: Version Applicability.
* Swift CSP FAQ, Section: Assessment Scheduling and Version Updates.


NEW QUESTION # 105
A Treasury Management System (TMS) application is installed on the same machine as the customer connector, connecting to a Service Bureau. Are these applications/systems in scope of CSCF? (Select the correct answer)
*Swift Customer Security Controls Policy
*Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025
*Independent Assessment Framework
*Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines
*Independent Assessment Framework - High-Level Test Plan Guidelines
*Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025
*CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree
*CSP_controls_matrix_and_high_test_plan_2025
*Assessment template for Mandatory controls
*Assessment template for Advisory controls
*CSCF Assessment Completion Letter
*Swift_CSP_Assessment_Report_Template

  • A. Only the customer connector application is in scope of the CSCF. The TMS application is a back-office
  • B. The TMS application, the customer connector, and the hosting system are in scope only if they connect directly to SWIFT, not towards a Service Bureau
  • C. The TMS application, the customer connector, and the hosting system are in the scope of the CSCF
  • D. The TMS application is the highest risk and must be secured appropriately. The customer connector should be secured on a best effort basis

Answer: C

Explanation:
The SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) defines the scope of components that must comply with its security controls, particularly those handling SWIFT-related data or connectivity. Let's analyze the scenario:
*A Treasury Management System (TMS) application is a back-office system used to manage financial operations, such as payments or liquidity management. A customer connector is a custom application or integration layer that connects the user's systems (e.g., TMS) to the SWIFT infrastructure, in this case via a Service Bureau. The hosting system is the physical or virtual machine on which both applications are installed.
*The TMS and customer connector are on the same machine, and the customer connector connects to a Service Bureau, which hosts the SWIFT communication infrastructure (e.g., Alliance Gateway).
*CSCF Scope: The "Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025" and "CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree" define the scope as including:
oCustomer connectors: These are in scope because they facilitate SWIFT connectivity (e.g., sending/receiving SWIFT messages), even if connecting via a Service Bureau.
oSystems hosting in-scope components: The hosting system (machine) is in scope because it runs the customer connector, which is directly involved in SWIFT data flows.
oBack-office systems (e.g., TMS): Normally, back-office systems are out of scope unless they are closely integrated with SWIFT infrastructure. In this case, the TMS is installed on the same machine as the customer connector, creating a shared environment. The CSCF considers systems in the same environment as in-scope if they could impact the security of SWIFT-related components (e.g., Control "1.1 SWIFT Environment Protection").
*Service Bureau Context: Connecting to a Service Bureau (architecture type A2) does not exempt the local components from CSCF scope. The "Independent Assessment Framework" requires assessing all local components that interact with SWIFT, even if the communication layer is outsourced.
*Option A: The TMS application, the customer connector, and the hosting system are in the scope of the CSCF This is correct. The customer connector is explicitly in scope as it handles SWIFT data flows. The hosting system is in scope because it runs the connector. The TMS, while typically a back-office system, is in scope because it shares the same machine, creating a risk of lateral movement or privilege escalation (e.g., CSCF Control "1.1"). The "CSP_controls_matrix_and_high_test_plan_2025" includes shared environments in the assessment scope.
*Option B: Only the customer connector application is in scope of the CSCF. The TMS application is a back- office This is incorrect. While the TMS is a back-office system, its co-location on the same machine as the customer connector brings it into scope due to shared risks, as per CSCF guidelines.
*Option C: The TMS application is the highest risk and must be secured appropriately. The customer connector should be secured on a best effort basis This is incorrect. The CSCF does not prioritize the TMS as the "highest risk" nor suggest "best effort" security for the customer connector. Both components must be secured per mandatory controls when in scope.
*Option D: The TMS application, the customer connector, and the hosting system are in scope only if they connect directly to SWIFT, not towards a Service Bureau This is incorrect. The CSCF scope includes components connecting via a Service Bureau, as they still handle SWIFT data and are part of the user's architecture (e.g., A2).
Summary of Correct answer:
The TMS application, customer connector, and hosting system are all in scope of the CSCF (A) due to their shared environment and connectivity to SWIFT via a Service Bureau.
References to SWIFT Customer Security Programme Documents:
*Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025: Control 1.1 includes shared environments in scope.
*CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree: Classifies A2 for Service Bureau setups with local connectors.
*Independent Assessment Framework: Requires assessing all components in shared environments.
========


NEW QUESTION # 106
A Swift user has moved from one Service Bureau to another What are the obligations of the Swift user in the CSP context?

  • A. To inform the SB certification office at Swift WW
  • B. To submit an updated attestation reflecting this change within 3 months
  • C. To reflect that in the next attestation cycle
  • D. None if there is no impact in the architecture tope

Answer: B


NEW QUESTION # 107
Which encryption methods are used to secure the communications between the SNL host and HSM boxes?

  • A. MPLS and SSL
  • B. NTLS and SSH
  • C. NTLS and Telnet
  • D. Telnet and SSL

Answer: B

Explanation:
This question focuses on the encryption methods securing communications between the SwiftNet Link (SNL) host and Hardware Security Module (HSM) boxes in the Swift environment.
Step 1: Understand SNL and HSM Communication
The SwiftNet Link (SNL) facilitates secure connectivity to the Swift network, while the HSM manages cryptographic keys. Secure communication between the SNL host and HSM is critical, as outlined inControl
2.5B: Cryptographic Key Managementof theCSCF v2024. These communications must use strong encryption protocols.
Step 2: Evaluate Each Option
* A. NTLS and SSH
* NTLS (Network Transport Layer Security): This is Swift's proprietary protocol for securing communications over the SwiftNet network, including between SNL and HSM. It provides end- to-end encryption and is widely used in Swift infrastructure, as confirmed in theSwift Alliance Gateway Technical Documentation.
* SSH (Secure Shell): SSH is used for secure management and administration of HSMs and SNL hosts, enabling encrypted remote access and configuration, as noted inSwift Security Best Practices.This combination aligns with Swift's security requirements for protecting HSM communications.Conclusion: This is correct.
* B. Telnet and SSL
* Telnet: An unencrypted protocol, unsuitable for secure communications, and not used in Swift's security framework perControl 2.6: Internet Accessibility Restriction.
* SSL (Secure Sockets Layer): An older encryption protocol, largely replaced by TLS in modern systems. Swift does not specify SSL for SNL-HSM communications, favoring NTLS.Conclusion: This is incorrect.
* C. NTLS and Telnet
* NTLS: As above, this is valid for SwiftNet communications.
* Telnet: As an unencrypted protocol, it is not acceptable for securing HSM communications, per Control 2.5B.Conclusion: This is incorrect.
* D. MPLS and SSL
* MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching): A networking technology for routing, not an encryption method, and not relevant to SNL-HSM security.
* SSL: As above, not used in this context by Swift.Conclusion: This is incorrect.
Step 3: Conclusion and Verification
The correct answer isA, as NTLS secures the data communication and SSH provides secure management access between the SNL host and HSM, consistent withCSCF v2024and Swift technical documentation.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Control 2.5B: Cryptographic Key Management, Control 2.6: Internet Accessibility Restriction.
* Swift Alliance Gateway Technical Documentation, Section: Network Security Protocols.
* Swift Security Best Practices, Section: HSM and SNL Configuration.


NEW QUESTION # 108
The internet connectivity restriction control prevents having internet access on any CSCE m-scope components.

  • A. FALSE
  • B. TRUE

Answer: A

Explanation:
This question addresses the internet connectivity restriction control and its application to CSCF in-scope components. Let's verify this against Swift CSP guidelines.
Step 1: Understand the Internet Connectivity Restriction Control
TheSwift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, underControl 2.6: Internet Accessibility Restriction, mandates that in-scope components (e.g., Swift messaging interfaces, communication interfaces) must not have direct internet access to prevent exposure to external threats. However, this control allows for exceptions under specific conditions.
Step 2: Analyze the Statement
The statement claims that the internet connectivity restriction control "prevents having internet access on any CSCF in-scope components." The key is to determine if this is an absolute prohibition or if exceptions exist.
Step 3: Evaluate Against CSCF Guidelines
* Control 2.6: Internet Accessibility Restrictionrequires that Swift-related systems be isolated from the internet to minimize attack surfaces. This includes components like messaging interfaces (e.g., Alliance Access) and communication interfaces (e.g., SNL).
* However, theCSCF v2024andSwift CSP FAQallow for controlled internet access under specific circumstances, such as:
* Use of secure tunnels (e.g., VPNs) or proxies for authorized management purposes.
* Temporary access for software updates or patches, provided it is tightly controlled and monitored (perControl 6.1: Security Event Logging).
* The control does not impose an absolute ban but requires that any internet access be restricted, audited, and justified. Thus, the statement that it "prevents having internet access on any CSCF in-scope components" is too absolute.
Step 4: Conclusion and Verification
The statement isFALSEbecause, while internet access is heavily restricted for in-scope components, it is not entirely prevented under all circumstances (e.g., controlled access for maintenance). This aligns with the flexible yet secure approach of theCSCF v2024.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Control 2.6: Internet Accessibility Restriction.
* Swift CSP FAQ, Section: Internet Access Exceptions.


NEW QUESTION # 109
......

CSP-Assessor Exam Questions of ExamcollectionPass are ideal for the students who are willing to prepare for the exam in a short time. The Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification (CSP-Assessor) professionals have worked hard on making this product one of the most successful and user-friendly. This Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification (CSP-Assessor) exam prep material came into existence after talking to many Swift professionals and getting their positive feedback. The ExamcollectionPass guarantees the customers that if they fail to pass the Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification (CSP-Assessor) exam despite all their efforts they can claim a refund according to some terms and conditions.

Valid CSP-Assessor Braindumps: https://www.examcollectionpass.com/Swift/CSP-Assessor-practice-exam-dumps.html

Report this page